From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carridine v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 22, 1999
741 So. 2d 616 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 99-2739.

Opinion filed September 22, 1999.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; John L. Phillips, Judge; L.T. Case No. 94-1182 CFA02.

Robert Carridine, South Bay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


Robert Carridine appeals the denial of his unsworn motion to correct sentence to award additional time served. Contrary to the pleading requirements of State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429, 433 (Fla. 1998) and Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947, 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), the motion did not affirmatively allege that the court records demonstrate entitlement to relief or identify where in the record that information could be located. The trial court quite properly denied the motion as legally insufficient.

The denial should have been without prejudice to Carridine to file a new motion that corrects the pleading deficiency.Quartucci v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1520 (Fla. 4th DCA June 30, 1999); Daily v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D949 (Fla. 4th DCA Apr. 7, 1999). Accordingly, our affirmance is without prejudice to file either (1) a rule 3.800 motion that affirmatively demonstrates on the face of the record entitlement to additional jail time credit or, alternatively, (2) a properly sworn rule 3.850 motion challenging the sentence based on the failure to award jail time credit. Fla. R. Crim. Pro. 3.800(a); 3.850 (1999). If Carridine elects the second option, the motion must be filed within the time remaining under that rule.

WARNER, C.J., STONE and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Carridine v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 22, 1999
741 So. 2d 616 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Carridine v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT CARRIDINE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Sep 22, 1999

Citations

741 So. 2d 616 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Lee v. State

The trial court quite properly denied the motion as legally insufficient and time-barred. In conformance with…

Tarr v. State

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's order without prejudice for appellant to file a sufficient rule…