From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carrazana v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 15, 2002
816 So. 2d 804 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 3D01-2477.

May 15, 2002.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Roberto M. Pineiro, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Linda S. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LEVY, SORONDO and RAMIREZ, JJ.


The state concedes that the judgment adjudicating defendant guilty of direct criminal contempt and sentence of incarceration failed to include a recital of the facts upon which the adjudication of guilt was based, as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830. Accordingly, the convictions and sentences are vacated and the cause is remanded for the trial court, if it wishes, to conduct further proceedings in accordance with the rule. See Alvis v. State, 764 So.2d 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).


Summaries of

Carrazana v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 15, 2002
816 So. 2d 804 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Carrazana v. State

Case Details

Full title:RUBEN CARRAZANA, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 15, 2002

Citations

816 So. 2d 804 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)