From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carr v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 6, 1991
411 S.E.2d 913 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

A91A1004.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 6, 1991. RECONSIDERATION DENIED OCTOBER 15, 1991.

Drug violation. Evans Superior Court. Before Judge Findley.

Hal T. Peel, for appellant. Dupont K. Cheney, District Attorney, Charles D. Howard, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


Appellant was convicted by a jury of selling cocaine in violation of OCGA § 16-13-30 (b), and because it was his second conviction under OCGA § 16-13-30 (b), he was sentenced to life imprisonment pursuant to OCGA § 16-13-30 (d). Appellant's sole enumeration of error is that the mandatory life sentencing provisions of OCGA § 16-13-30 (d) are unconstitutional in that they violate the Eighth and Fourteenth amendments. Despite appellant's attempt to distinguish his case, we find that his case is controlled by Grant v. State, 258 Ga. 299 (2) ( 368 S.E.2d 737) (1988), in which the Supreme Court of Georgia held that OCGA § 16-13-30 (d) did not constitute cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth and Fourteenth amendments.

Judgment affirmed. Birdsong, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 6, 1991 — RECONSIDERATION DENIED OCTOBER 15, 1991.


Summaries of

Carr v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 6, 1991
411 S.E.2d 913 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Carr v. State

Case Details

Full title:CARR v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 6, 1991

Citations

411 S.E.2d 913 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)
411 S.E.2d 913

Citing Cases

Dennard v. State

Accordingly, the trial court did not err in denying his motion to vacate the sentence. In 1988, our Supreme…