From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carr v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 7, 1994
642 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 92-03773.

October 7, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Diana M. Allen, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and D.P. Chanco, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anne Y. Swing, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Harold J. Carr challenges various costs and fees imposed as conditions of probation. We find error in only two assessments. The record fails to cite the authorization for imposing costs payable to the Court Improvement Fund and the Hillsborough County Drug Fund. These discretionary costs cannot be assessed unless the record specifies the statutory authority. Accordingly, we strike these costs. See Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We affirm in all other respects. On remand, the state may seek these costs again pursuant to Sutton.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and BLUE and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Carr v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 7, 1994
642 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Carr v. State

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD J. CARR, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 7, 1994

Citations

642 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Reyes v. State

Accordingly, we strike this assessment and prohibit its reassessment on remand. Aultman v. State, 515 So.2d…

Moore v. State

We affirm the judgment and sentence in this Anders appeal except for the imposition of costs of $36 for First…