Carr v. Harrington

Full title: CLAUDE Z. CARR, Petitioner, v. KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Aug 18, 2011

EDCV 10-1832-VBF (OP) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2011)

Opinion

CLAUDE Z. CARR, Petitioner, v. KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden, Respondent. No. EDCV 10-1832-VBF (OP) United States District Court, C.D. California. August 18, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Petitioner's Objections thereto. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge,

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered: (1) approving and adopting this Report and Recommendation; and (2) directing that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.