From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carr v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 29, 1937
252 App. Div. 880 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Opinion

November 29, 1937.


In an action to recover for personal injuries, order striking out the parts of appellant's answer styled "cross complaint," being paragraphs sixth to sixteenth, both inclusive, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to appellant to plead over within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The cross-complaint is insufficient in that it fails to allege that appellant has been damaged by the sole negligence of the defendant bus company, or for that reason will have been damaged if plaintiff recover a judgment against appellant. (See Birchall v. Clemons Realty Co., Inc., 241 App. Div. 286.) Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Carr v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 29, 1937
252 App. Div. 880 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
Case details for

Carr v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS J. CARR, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 29, 1937

Citations

252 App. Div. 880 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)