From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carpink v. Karpink

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 20, 1944
53 N.E.2d 845 (N.Y. 1944)

Opinion

Argued December 7, 1943

Decided January 20, 1944

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, DINEEN, J.

Nathaniel H. Brower and Jesse Friedman for appellant.

Robert L. Bobrick for respondent.


Orders reversed and matters remitted to the Appellate Division for compliance with Civil Practice Act, section 602 (as amd. by L. 1942, ch. 297), without costs. Although we find in the record some evidence which supports the order of Special Term, the order of the Appellate Division fails to state whether the determination of that court is upon the law, or upon the facts, or upon the law and the facts. (See 292 N.Y. 582.)

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ.


Summaries of

Carpink v. Karpink

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 20, 1944
53 N.E.2d 845 (N.Y. 1944)
Case details for

Carpink v. Karpink

Case Details

Full title:MARY CARPINK, also Known as MARY KARPINK, Respondent, v. FRED KARPINK…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 20, 1944

Citations

53 N.E.2d 845 (N.Y. 1944)
53 N.E.2d 845

Citing Cases

Carpink v. Karpink

Motion by appellant to cancel the remittitur and for a stay denied. (See 292 N.Y. 502.)…