From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carpenter v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Mar 14, 2016
Civil Action No. 13-01637 (CKK/GMH) (D.D.C. Mar. 14, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-01637 (CKK/GMH)

03-14-2016

PHILLIP S. CARPENTER, Plaintiff v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, In her official capacity as Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 24, 2016, the Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey's Report and Recommendation was entered, and the parties were allowed 14 days to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. No objections have been filed as of this date. Upon careful consideration of the record in this case and of Magistrate Judge Harvey's [24] Report and Recommendation, the Court ADOPTS and ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation in full.

The Court shall GRANT Plaintiff's [15] Motion for Judgment of Reversal and DENY Defendant's [18] Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The Court shall vacate the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff disability benefits, and remand the matter back to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings, which may include the taking of additional testimony to resolve the conflict between the vocational expert's testimony and the information provided by the Dictionary of Occupational Titles.

An appropriate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/_________

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Carpenter v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Mar 14, 2016
Civil Action No. 13-01637 (CKK/GMH) (D.D.C. Mar. 14, 2016)
Case details for

Carpenter v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP S. CARPENTER, Plaintiff v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, In her official…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Mar 14, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-01637 (CKK/GMH) (D.D.C. Mar. 14, 2016)

Citing Cases

Jennifer S. v. Berryhill

Henderson v. Colvin, 643 F. App'x 273, 277 (4th Cir. 2016) (per curiam); see Rounds v. Comm'r Soc. Sec.…

Proctor v. Colvin

The Fourth Circuit has held, however, that "there is an apparent conflict between an RFC that limits [a…