Opinion
No. 28340
Decided December 11, 1940.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Partnerships — Purchase of partner's interest — By other partner acting as undisclosed agent — Agreement to assume partnership debts — Validity of chattel mortgage on partnetship assets — Given to secure purchase price — Reversal by Court of Appeals — Section 6, Article IV, Constitution.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals of Hamilton county.
Mr. Stanley A. Silversteen and Mr. B. Wm. Heidkamp, for appellant. Messrs. Burns Friedman and Mr. Earl H. Coplan, for appellee.
It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., DAY, ZIMMERMAN, TURNER, WILLIAMS, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.