From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caron v. TD Ameritrade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 30, 2020
19 CIVIL 9015 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2020)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 9015 (AJN)

11-30-2020

Douglas R. Caron, Plaintiff, v. TD Ameritrade, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated November 30, 2020, Defendants' motions to dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint with prejudice is GRANTED and the motions to intervene are DENIED. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

November 30, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Caron v. TD Ameritrade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 30, 2020
19 CIVIL 9015 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2020)
Case details for

Caron v. TD Ameritrade

Case Details

Full title:Douglas R. Caron, Plaintiff, v. TD Ameritrade, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 30, 2020

Citations

19 CIVIL 9015 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2020)