From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caro Capital, LLC v. Koch

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 20, 2021
20-cv-6153 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 20, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-6153 (LJL)

08-20-2021

CARO CAPITAL, LLC, CARO PARTNERS, LLC, JUPITER WELLNESS, INC., BRIAN JOHN, and RICHARD MILLER, Plaintiffs, v. ROBERT KOCH, BEDFORD INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC, KAIZEN ADVISORS LLC, and JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendants.


ORDER

LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge:

Plaintiffs' motion at Dkt. No. 88 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiffs may serve a subpoena on Kaizen provided that the subpoena is served on or before August 27, 2021. Plaintiffs' request by letter motion to amend the complaint is denied. A letter motion is not the appropriate vehicle for such a motion. Plaintiffs may make a formal motion to amend, which the Court will decide after it is fully briefed. The motion by Defendants-Counterclaim-Plaintiffs for discovery at Dkt. No. 89 is DENIED. Defendants-Counterclaim-Plaintiffs have not established that any documents have been wrongfully withheld. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motions at Dkt. Nos. 88 and 89.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Caro Capital, LLC v. Koch

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 20, 2021
20-cv-6153 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Caro Capital, LLC v. Koch

Case Details

Full title:CARO CAPITAL, LLC, CARO PARTNERS, LLC, JUPITER WELLNESS, INC., BRIAN JOHN…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 20, 2021

Citations

20-cv-6153 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 20, 2021)