Summary
finding although the ALJ erred by finding claimant's seizure disorder to be a severe impairment and failing to incorporate limitations from the disorder into the RFC, it was clear he intended to include seizure limitations because the hypothetical questions posed to the VE at the hearing included such limitations, so there was no need to remand the case
Summary of this case from Scott C. P. v. BerryhillOpinion
No. 3:12-CV-3535-N (BF)
2013-09-20
JENNIFER CARNLEY, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant.
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Objections were filed. The District Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation to which objection was made. The objections are overruled.
Accordingly, the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's applications is AFFIRMED and Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice.
________________________
DAVID C. GODBEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE