From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carmouche v. Chapman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Aug 6, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-336-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Aug. 6, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-336-JJB-SCR

08-06-2012

DESHON M. CARMOUCHE (#345420) v. ADA JACKLYN C. CHAPMAN


RULING

The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger dated June 26, 2012 (doc. no. 5). The plaintiff filed an objection which essentially makes the same arguments and has been duly considered by the court.

The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the court's opinion herein. Accordingly, the plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§1915(e)(2)(B)(l), and without leave to amend because there is no conceivable, non-frivolous federal claim he could assert consistent with the facts alleged in his complaint.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 6th day of August, 2012.

_________________

JAMES J. BRADY, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Carmouche v. Chapman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Aug 6, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-336-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Aug. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Carmouche v. Chapman

Case Details

Full title:DESHON M. CARMOUCHE (#345420) v. ADA JACKLYN C. CHAPMAN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Aug 6, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-336-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Aug. 6, 2012)