Carmichael v. Riley

Full title: RICHARD LEE CARMICHAEL, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM RILEY, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Jun 9, 2008

Case No. C06-5542 RJB/KLS (W.D. Wash. Jun. 9, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. C06-5542 RJB/KLS.

June 9, 2008

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

KAREN STROMBOM, Magistrate Judge

Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to stay (Dkt. # 89) Defendants' motion to dismiss second amended complaint (Dkt. # 87) until counsel has been appointed on his behalf. (Dkt. # 81). Defendants do not oppose a reasonable stay. (Dkt. # 90).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

(1) Plaintiff's motion to stay Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 89) is GRANTED and Defendants' motion to dismiss second amended complaint (Dkt. # 87) presently noted for June 6, 2008 shall be stricken from the court's calendar. Defendants may re-note the motion not less than sixty (60) days after counsel has been appointed.

(2) The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and to counsel for Defendants.