From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carmichael v. Hooper

United States District Court, Northern District of Alabama
Feb 3, 2022
5:21-cv-00096-LCB-JHE (N.D. Ala. Feb. 3, 2022)

Opinion

5:21-cv-00096-LCB-JHE

02-03-2022

RODERICK CARMICHAEL, Plaintiff, v. DR. HOOPER, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

LILES C. BURKE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The magistrate judge entered a report and recommendation on January 10, 2022, recommending the defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 11) be granted. (Doc. 18). Although the parties were advised of their right to file objections within 14 days, that time has expired with no objections having been received by the court.

Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's report and ACCEPTS the recommendation. The court EXPRESSLY FINDS that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the defendants are entitled to judgment in their favor as a matter of law. Accordingly, the court shall ORDER that the defendants' motion for summary judgment be GRANTED on the plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to medical needs, and that the plaintiffs state law medical malpractice claim be DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c).

A Final Judgment will be entered.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Carmichael v. Hooper

United States District Court, Northern District of Alabama
Feb 3, 2022
5:21-cv-00096-LCB-JHE (N.D. Ala. Feb. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Carmichael v. Hooper

Case Details

Full title:RODERICK CARMICHAEL, Plaintiff, v. DR. HOOPER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Alabama

Date published: Feb 3, 2022

Citations

5:21-cv-00096-LCB-JHE (N.D. Ala. Feb. 3, 2022)