Opinion
8175
01-22-2019
In re CARMELA M.K., Petitioner–Appellant, v. MICHAEL E.M., Respondent–Respondent.
Carmela M.K., appellant pro se.
Carmela M.K., appellant pro se.
Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Tom, Kern, Singh, JJ.
Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Gayle P. Roberts, J.), entered on or about December 5, 2017, which denied petitioner mother's objection to an order of the same court (Harold E. Bahr III, Support Magistrate), entered on or about October 11, 2017, dismissing her support violation petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Family Court properly denied the mother's objection to the order dismissing her petition, since the support obligation she sought to enforce had, with the youngest child's attainment of age 21, expired by the terms of the parties' stipulation and by operation of law (see Family Ct. Act § 413 ; Matter of Thomas B. v. Lydia D., 69 A.D.3d 24, 886 N.Y.S.2d 22 [1st Dept. 2009] ). The mother's objection failed to show how this conclusion was incorrect or why her petition should have otherwise been allowed to proceed, as she did not show how any order was violated by respondent father.
We have considered the mother's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.