Carlton v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Full title: DAVID CARLTON, Plaintiff, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: May 9, 2007

8:05CV293 (D. Neb. May. 9, 2007)

Opinion

8:05CV293.

May 9, 2007

ORDER

KAREN SCHREIER, District Judge

Pending before the court are defendant's renewal of motion for judgment as a matter of law and plaintiff's motion for attorney fees. A Satisfaction of Judgment was entered in this case on April 16, 2007. It is hereby

ORDERED that defendant's renewal of motion for judgment as a matter of law (Docket 133) is denied as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for attorney fees (Docket 135) is denied as moot.