From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carlson v. Costan Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 23, 1961
173 N.E.2d 806 (N.Y. 1961)

Opinion

Argued January 18, 1961

Decided February 23, 1961

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, THOMAS E. MORRISSEY, JR., J.

Alfred S. Julien, Marie M. Lambert and David G. Lubell for appellant.

Richard E. Shandell, Edward A. Shandell and Joseph J. Brophy for defendants-respondents and third-party plaintiff-appellant.

Harold Klein, Charles G. Tierney, Harry Schechter and Raymond C. Green for third-party defendant-respondent.



Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE. Chief Judge DESMOND and Judge FOSTER dissent and vote to reverse upon the ground that, within the reasonable meaning of the statute (Labor Law, § 315, subd. 2), the place where the accident occurred was in a "tenant-factory building".


Summaries of

Carlson v. Costan Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 23, 1961
173 N.E.2d 806 (N.Y. 1961)
Case details for

Carlson v. Costan Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BERTHA CARLSON, Appellant, v. COSTAN CORP., et al., Respondents. COSTAN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 23, 1961

Citations

173 N.E.2d 806 (N.Y. 1961)
173 N.E.2d 806
213 N.Y.S.2d 86

Citing Cases

Weiss v. City of New York

Plaintiff's side prevailed at Supreme Court but the Appellate Division reversed, holding that the…