From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carlson v. Avery

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three
Oct 13, 1987
49 Wn. App. 1045 (Wash. Ct. App. 1987)

Summary

In Carlson v. Avery Co., 196 Ill. App. 262, decided in 1916, the court cited Chicago N.W. Ry. Co. v. Dunleavy, 129 Ill. 132, 22 NE 15 and stated that special verdicts, authorized by the Practice Act of 1907, were to be distinguished from special findings which accompany a general verdict.

Summary of this case from Crooks v. Sayles

Opinion

No. 7818-3-III.

October 13, 1987. UNREPORTED OPINION

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 85-2-03931-3, John A. Schultheis, J., entered May 14, 1986.


Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Thompson, J., concurred in by McInturff, C.J., and Munson, J.


Summaries of

Carlson v. Avery

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three
Oct 13, 1987
49 Wn. App. 1045 (Wash. Ct. App. 1987)

In Carlson v. Avery Co., 196 Ill. App. 262, decided in 1916, the court cited Chicago N.W. Ry. Co. v. Dunleavy, 129 Ill. 132, 22 NE 15 and stated that special verdicts, authorized by the Practice Act of 1907, were to be distinguished from special findings which accompany a general verdict.

Summary of this case from Crooks v. Sayles
Case details for

Carlson v. Avery

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH CARLSON, ET AL, Respondents, v. DAVID A. AVERY, ET AL, Appellants

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three

Date published: Oct 13, 1987

Citations

49 Wn. App. 1045 (Wash. Ct. App. 1987)
49 Wash. App. 1045

Citing Cases

Crooks v. Sayles

" In Carlson v. Avery Co., 196 Ill. App. 262, decided in 1916, the court cited Chicago N.W. Ry. Co. v.…

Buesing v. Moon Motor Car Co.

(1) The evidence is insufficient to sustain the finding, and the award based thereon, of eighty-three weeks'…