Summary
In Carll v. Oakley, 97 N.Y. 633, it was held that the acceptance and retention by an attorney for one of the parties of a sum allowed him for costs is an acquiescence in the judgment and estops such party or his attorney from taking and prosecuting an appeal from such judgment.
Summary of this case from United Typesetting v. Congress Tr. Sav. BankOpinion
Argued October 21, 1884
Decided October 31, 1884
Benjamin G. Hitchings for appellants.
James H. Stanbrough for respondent.
Per Curiam mem. for affirmance.
All concur.
Order affirmed.