From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carlisle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 13, 1998
706 So. 2d 414 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

Case No. 98-405.

Opinion filed March 13, 1998. JANUARY TERM 1998.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition, S. James Foxman, Respondent Judge.

Robert E.H. Carlisle, Daytona Beach, pro se.

No Appearance for Respondent.


DENIED. See Salser v. State, 582 So.2d 12 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), rev. dismissed, 613 So.2d 471 (Fla. 1993) (holding a criminal defendant does not have the right to a hybrid representation, and by requesting counsel, the defendant waived his right to self-representation).

DAUKSCH, GOSHORN, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Carlisle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 13, 1998
706 So. 2d 414 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Carlisle v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT E.H. CARLISLE, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Mar 13, 1998

Citations

706 So. 2d 414 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)