From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carlisle v. Carlisle

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 11, 2000
750 So. 2d 165 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Summary

reversing a final judgment changing the parties' children's maternal surname to that of the father because nothing in the record disclosed why the name change was in the children's best interests

Summary of this case from Doyle v. Owens

Opinion

No. 1D99-2649.

Opinion filed February 11, 2000.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County, Charles O. Mitchell, Jr., Judge.

Alan D. Henderson of Henderson Keasler Law Firm, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.


This is an appeal from a final judgment of dissolution changing the parties' children's maternal surname to that of the father. Because nothing in the record discloses why the change in the children's name is in the best interest of the children, the cause is remanded to allow the trial court to reconsider the issue, pursuant to the standard approved inDurham v. McNair, 659 So.2d 1291 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

ERVIN, BOOTH and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Carlisle v. Carlisle

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 11, 2000
750 So. 2d 165 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

reversing a final judgment changing the parties' children's maternal surname to that of the father because nothing in the record disclosed why the name change was in the children's best interests

Summary of this case from Doyle v. Owens
Case details for

Carlisle v. Carlisle

Case Details

Full title:CRYSTAL RENEE CARLISLE, n/k/a CRYSTAL RENEE LEGRAND, Appellant, v. BRYAN…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 11, 2000

Citations

750 So. 2d 165 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Doyle v. Owens

See Bardin v. State, Dep't of Revenue, 720 So.2d 609, 612 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Girten, 698 So.2d at 888 ("The…