From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carlin v. Cornell, Hegarty Koch

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jul 16, 1997
697 A.2d 543 (N.J. 1997)

Opinion

July 16, 1997.


ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division for reconsideration of whether plaintiffs' counsel acted reasonably in response to Judge Orlando's December 16, 1994, disposition of the motion of plaintiff Carlin, et al., to amend the complaint (motion denied with court directing counsel to file a new action) and Judge Fluharty's January 3, 1995, disposition of plaintiff Allen's motion to amend the complaint (motion denied with court concluding that plaintiff could file a new action without adverse consequences under the Entire Controversy Doctrine). See Olds v. Donnelly, 150 N.J. 424, 696 A.2d 633 (1997).


Summaries of

Carlin v. Cornell, Hegarty Koch

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jul 16, 1997
697 A.2d 543 (N.J. 1997)
Case details for

Carlin v. Cornell, Hegarty Koch

Case Details

Full title:JOHN T. CARLIN, ET AL. v. CORNELL, HEGARTY KOCH, ETC., ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jul 16, 1997

Citations

697 A.2d 543 (N.J. 1997)
697 A.2d 543