From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carl v. Muskegon Cnty.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Dec 9, 2015
871 N.W.2d 709 (Mich. 2015)

Opinion

Docket No. 151311. COA No. 319017.

12-09-2015

Timothy A. CARL, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. MUSKEGON COUNTY, Mark Burns, Todd Gilchrist, Theresa Jones–Burton, Brian Bonstell, Leonard Bethke and Brendan Bowen, Personal Representatives of the Estate of Christy Bowen, Darryl Hairston, Jason Cerka, Richard Topp, Scott Smith, Dean Roseler as Muskegon County Sheriff and Individually, and Steven J. Weinert, Defendants, and Katherine A. Jawor, D.O., Defendant–Appellee.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 26, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Carl v. Muskegon Cnty.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Dec 9, 2015
871 N.W.2d 709 (Mich. 2015)
Case details for

Carl v. Muskegon Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:Timothy A. CARL, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. MUSKEGON COUNTY, Mark Burns, Todd…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Dec 9, 2015

Citations

871 N.W.2d 709 (Mich. 2015)
498 Mich. 935