From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carl v. Lane

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 27, 2020
18 CIVIL 1217 (GBD) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 2020)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 1217 (GBD)

02-27-2020

KIM CARL, Plaintiff, v. SERGEANT ANDREW LANE, SERGEANT OTON UKAJ, POLICE OFFICER LASHANNEN HOGUE, POLICE OFFICER JASON PHILLIPS, POLICE OFFICER ALEXANDER BESS and POLICE OFFICER TADEUSZ TROJANOWSKI, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated February 26, 2020, Defendants' oral application pursuant to Federal Rule Civil Procedure 50 for judgment as a matter of law following a jury trial in this action is granted; judgment is hereby entered, and the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

February 27, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Carl v. Lane

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 27, 2020
18 CIVIL 1217 (GBD) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 2020)
Case details for

Carl v. Lane

Case Details

Full title:KIM CARL, Plaintiff, v. SERGEANT ANDREW LANE, SERGEANT OTON UKAJ, POLICE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Feb 27, 2020

Citations

18 CIVIL 1217 (GBD) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 2020)