Caridad v. Aguirre

Full title: BENJAMIN CARIDAD, Plaintiff, v. DEAN AGUIRRE, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 18, 2013

2:13-cv-0154 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 18, 2013)

Opinion

BENJAMIN CARIDAD, Plaintiff, v. DEAN AGUIRRE, et al., Defendants. No. 2:13-cv-0154 EFB P United States District Court, E.D. California. June 18, 2013

          ORDER

          EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff's consent. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4).

         On May 8, 2013, the court dismissed plaintiff's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The dismissal order explained the complaint's deficiencies, gave plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint correcting those deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint would result in this action being dismissed. The time for acting has passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

         Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED. Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. Local Rule 110.