From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cardoza v. Lawrence Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 29, 1995
216 A.D.2d 254 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

June 29, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.).


The IAS Court correctly found issues of fact precluding summary judgment in favor of defendant hospital, including whether the defendant physician, who treated plaintiff upon arrival at the hospital's emergency room, was acting on the hospital's behalf at the time of his alleged acts of malpractice ( cf., Sarivola v Brookdale Hosp. Med. Ctr., 204 A.D.2d 245; Nagengast v Samaritan Hosp., 211 A.D.2d 878), and whether the treatment by either or both the physician and hospital staff deviated from accepted medical practice, parties having submitted conflicting expert affidavits in that regard ( see, Farkas v. Saary, 191 A.D.2d 178, 180-181).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Kupferman, Asch, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Cardoza v. Lawrence Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 29, 1995
216 A.D.2d 254 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Cardoza v. Lawrence Hospital

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER CARDOZA et al., Respondents, v. LAWRENCE HOSPITAL, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 29, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 254 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
628 N.Y.S.2d 1013

Citing Cases

Harrington v. Neurological Institute

We cannot agree with the motion court that the evidence submitted by defendant Columbia Presbyterian Medical…