From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cardinal v. Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Feb 8, 2013
Civil No.: 12cv2921 (MJD/SER) (D. Minn. Feb. 8, 2013)

Opinion

Civil No.: 12cv2921 (MJD/SER)

02-08-2013

Wanda Elaine Cardinal, and Christopher Cardinal, Plaintiffs, v. Scott Walker, J.B. Van Hollen, Department of Corrections, St. Croix Co., St. Croix Co. Attorney, City of Hudson, Marty Jensen, Hudson Fire Chief, Hudson City Attorney, Hudson City Council, Joseph Starkey, Emily Dexter, Officer Hartman, Officer Rieger, Officer Rankin, Officer Rangour, Mike O'Keefe, and Alan Burchill, Defendants.


ORDER

The above-captioned case comes before the undersigned on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed within the requisite time period. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs' application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, (Docket No. 2), be DENIED;
2. Plaintiffs' motion for appointment of counsel, (Docket No. 4), be DENIED; and
3. This action is summarily DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

________

Michael J. Davis

Chief Judge

U.S. District Court


Summaries of

Cardinal v. Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Feb 8, 2013
Civil No.: 12cv2921 (MJD/SER) (D. Minn. Feb. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Cardinal v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:Wanda Elaine Cardinal, and Christopher Cardinal, Plaintiffs, v. Scott…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Feb 8, 2013

Citations

Civil No.: 12cv2921 (MJD/SER) (D. Minn. Feb. 8, 2013)