From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cardillo v. Bonito

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 8, 1998
256 A.D.2d 69 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 8, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.).


It was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny defendant the opportunity to conduct a physical examination of plaintiff Marco Cardillo on the ground that she had failed to do so within the time constraints set forth in a preliminary conference order, especially in light of the fact that the note of issue was filed four months before the discovery deadline contained in the preliminary conference order. We modify to provide for such examination.

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

Cardillo v. Bonito

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 8, 1998
256 A.D.2d 69 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Cardillo v. Bonito

Case Details

Full title:MARCO CARDILLO et al., Respondents, v. LYDIA BONITO, Individually and as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 8, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 69 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
681 N.Y.S.2d 752

Citing Cases

Smith v. Mousa

Defendant's motion was not calendared for argument until September 13, 2002, and in the interim, plaintiff…

Garcia v. Munnerlyn

Certain general principles can be extracted from a review of the cases, which, at first glance, may seem…