From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carder v. Lamb

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Columbia Division
Jun 29, 2022
1:21-cv-00074 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 29, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00074

06-29-2022

JAMES STEPHEN CARDER Plaintiff, v. BILLY LAMB, et al., Defendants.


HOLMES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER

WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 21) recommending the Court grant Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 16). Plaintiff did not respond to Defendants' Motion and has not filed any objections to Report and Recommendation.

The Report and Recommendation advised the parties that any objections to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation were to be filed within fourteen days of service (Doc. No. 21 at 8). As stated above, no objections have been filed.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes that it should be ADOPTED. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 16) is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

This Order shall constitute final judgment for purposes of Fed.R.Civ.P. 58. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Carder v. Lamb

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Columbia Division
Jun 29, 2022
1:21-cv-00074 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Carder v. Lamb

Case Details

Full title:JAMES STEPHEN CARDER Plaintiff, v. BILLY LAMB, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Columbia Division

Date published: Jun 29, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-00074 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 29, 2022)