From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carco Group, Inc. v. Maconachy

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Dec 22, 2010
CV 05-6038 (ARL) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 22, 2010)

Opinion

CV 05-6038 (ARL).

December 22, 2010


ORDER


Before the court is plaintiffs' motion by letter application dated December 20, 2010, seeking leave to: (1) strike all legal arguments contained in "Defendant Drew Maconachy's Response to Plaintiff's Proposed Findings of Fact"; and (2) strike "Defendant Drew Maconachy's Proposed Findings of Fact" in its entirety. Defendant opposes the motion

Plaintiffs' application is granted. At a conference held before the undersigned on September 1, 2010, the procedure for resolving the limited remand on damages was established. In particular, it was agreed that (i) plaintiffs would submit proposed findings of fact in support an award of damages; (ii) defendant would submit proposed findings noting any disputed facts; and (iii) plaintiffs may, file a reply. Each set of proposed findings was to include citations to the record. A memorandum of law could be submitted if the court requested one.

The defendant's submissions fail to comply with the procedures set forth above. Accordingly, defendant is directed to submit his response on or before January 7, 2011. Plaintiffs may file a reply to defendant's submission on or before January 28, 2011.

Dated: Central Islip, New York

December 22, 2010

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

Carco Group, Inc. v. Maconachy

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Dec 22, 2010
CV 05-6038 (ARL) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 22, 2010)
Case details for

Carco Group, Inc. v. Maconachy

Case Details

Full title:CARCO GROUP, INC. and PONJEB V, L.L.C., Plaintiffs, v. DREW MACONACHY…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Dec 22, 2010

Citations

CV 05-6038 (ARL) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 22, 2010)