Opinion
May 27, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.).
The jury's finding that the traffic/pedestrian signal time sequence allotted to the intersection of Horatio Street and Eighth Avenue, where the subject accident took place on February 5, 1985, was not the proximate cause of plaintiff's injuries is based on a fair interpretation of the evidence and thus will not be disturbed (see, Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 N.Y.2d 493). Plaintiff pedestrian was struck by defendant Fred Lane, III's motorcycle as she was midway across Eighth Avenue. The evidence demonstrated that the traffic timing sequence in place on the date in question provided sufficient time for the average pedestrian to cross the subject intersection. Although plaintiff had the "Walk" signal in her favor, she waited for half a dozen or so vehicles to turn onto Eighth Avenue from Horatio Street as none of them yielded to her in the crosswalk. Thus, sufficient time elapsed that by the time she proceeded to cross she was caught near the middle of Eighth Avenue when the northbound vehicular traffic received the green light. Even if one could attribute negligence to the City's timing sequence, which the jury did, under the facts herein, the jury could find such negligence was not the proximate cause of her injuries.
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Milonas, Kupferman, Ross and Nardelli, JJ.