From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carbins v. Vroom Auto.

United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana
Mar 18, 2024
6:23-CV-00830 (W.D. La. Mar. 18, 2024)

Opinion

6:23-CV-00830

03-18-2024

LOUIS W. CARBINS, JR. ET AL. v. VROOM AUTOMOTIVE LLC, ET AL.


DAVID J. AYO MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JUDGMENT

ROBERT R. SUMMERHAYS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before this Court is a MOTION TO STAY AND TO COMPEL ARBITRATION filed by defendants Vroom Automotive, LLC and Vroom, Inc. (collectively “Vroom”) (Rec. Doc. 10). This motion was referred to United States Magistrate Judge David J. Ayo for report and recommendation. After an independent review of the record, noting the absence of objections filed, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, consistent with the report and recommendation, Plaintiffs MOTION TO STAY AND TO COMPEL ARBITRATION (Rec. Doc. 10) is GRANTED in part such that all claims by plaintiff Louis W. Carbins against Vroom are STAYED and all such claims shall be arbitrated according to the binding arbitration agreement between these parties. Vroom's motion is DENIED in part to the extent that it seeks to stay and compel arbitration as to all claims asserted by plaintiff Hiedi Carbins in this case. Vroom may renew its motion at its discretion but should provide sufficient law and argument as discussed in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.


Summaries of

Carbins v. Vroom Auto.

United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana
Mar 18, 2024
6:23-CV-00830 (W.D. La. Mar. 18, 2024)
Case details for

Carbins v. Vroom Auto.

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS W. CARBINS, JR. ET AL. v. VROOM AUTOMOTIVE LLC, ET AL.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana

Date published: Mar 18, 2024

Citations

6:23-CV-00830 (W.D. La. Mar. 18, 2024)