From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carberry v. Bonilla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 1978
65 A.D.2d 613 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Opinion

October 30, 1978


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant Weinfurt appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 11, 1977, which denied his motion for a protective order vacating plaintiff's notice to take deposition upon oral examination. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The examination shall proceed at a time and place to be fixed in a written notice of not less than 15 days, to be given by plaintiff, or at such other time and place as the parties may agree. "Absent a showing of hardship, the nonresidence of a defendant does not preclude an examination in the county where the action is pending" (Gazerwitz v Adrian, 28 A.D.2d 556, 557; Cooper v Met Merchandising, 54 A.D.2d 859). At bar, the motion for a protective order was based solely upon the affirmation of the attorney for the appellant, and did not state any facts to support the conclusory assertion of hardship. We also note that no objection was taken to the place of the examination, which ordinarily would be Suffolk County and not Nassau County. Hopkins, J.P., Martuscello, Gulotta and Shapiro, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Carberry v. Bonilla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 1978
65 A.D.2d 613 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)
Case details for

Carberry v. Bonilla

Case Details

Full title:FLORENCE CARBERRY, Respondent, v. SERGIO BONILLA, Defendant, and FRED…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 30, 1978

Citations

65 A.D.2d 613 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Citing Cases

Nimkoff v. Central Park Plaza Associates, LLC

Here, the defendants failed to demonstrate that taking depositions of individual defendants would result in…

Matter of Rattner v. Planning Commission

Order affirmed, with costs. Under the circumstances at bar, Special Term did not abuse its discretion when it…