From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caraway v. Herbert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 12, 2001
285 A.D.2d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Decided and Entered: July 12, 2001.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Raynard Caraway, Malone, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Laura Etlinger of counsel), Albany, for respondents.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Mugglin and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit violent conduct, assaulting another inmate, possession of a weapon and disobeying a direct order. According to the misbehavior report, petitioner was seen leaving the victim's cell with a three-inch weapon and ignored orders from a correction officer to stop. The victim was found to have suffered a three-inch cut on the side of his face. Notwithstanding the fact that no weapon was ever found, the detailed misbehavior report and testimony presented at the hearing, together with the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see, Matter of Davis v. Selsky, 270 A.D.2d 548;Matter of Cliff v. De Celle, 260 A.D.2d 812, 813, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 814). Although the victim contradicted an earlier statement by testifying at the hearing that petitioner was not the one who cut him, this created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Primo v. Goord, 266 A.D.2d 602).

We are unpersuaded by petitioner's assertion that the hearing was not conducted in a fair and impartial manner because he was denied relevant documentary evidence and the right to call witnesses. The information sought by petitioner, including the extent of the victim's injury, was either redundant or irrelevant to the charges (see, Matter of Burse v. Goord, 274 A.D.2d 678). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Caraway v. Herbert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 12, 2001
285 A.D.2d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Caraway v. Herbert

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RAYNARD CARAWAY, Petitioner, v. VICTOR T. HERBERT, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 12, 2001

Citations

285 A.D.2d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
726 N.Y.S.2d 825

Citing Cases

Vega v. New York State Dep't of Corr. Servs.

he stated that he did not witness the events and did not participate in the investigation. Given that the…

Santana v. Selsky

In addition, the misbehavior reports would have been redundant to the evidence presented at the disciplinary…