From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carageorge v. Fidelity Guar. Life

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 13, 1977
345 So. 2d 865 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. BB-460.

May 13, 1977.

Appeal from the Escambia County Circuit Court, Ralph M. McLane, J.

Roderic G. Magie, Levin, Warfield, Middlebrooks, Graff, Mabie, Rosenbloum Magie, P.A., Pensacola, for appellant.

Donald H. Partington, Clark, Partington, Hart Hart, Pensacola, for appellee.


Appellant's claim under an employees' group policy of life insurance, for benefits attending the death of his wife, was rejected by a jury verdict and the trial court's judgment. The master policy and the employee's certificate provided that "If a person is not actively at work on the date his insurance would otherwise become effective, the insurance shall not become effective until the date he returns to active work." Appellant's wife, the employee, was on leave for extended illness when the policy would otherwise have become effective, and she never returned to active work. The policy therefore never insured appellant's wife. No error otherwise appears. See Couch v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co., 216 So.2d 72 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968). Contrast Denton v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co., 323 So.2d 17 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).

AFFIRMED.

MILLS, Acting C.J., and SMITH and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Carageorge v. Fidelity Guar. Life

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 13, 1977
345 So. 2d 865 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Carageorge v. Fidelity Guar. Life

Case Details

Full title:TED CARAGEORGE, APPELLANT, v. FIDELITY GUARANTY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: May 13, 1977

Citations

345 So. 2d 865 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

Radoff v. North American Co. for Life & Health Insurance

The provision in the group policy conditioning its effectiveness upon the insured being in regular…

Gulf Life Insurance Company v. Hickey

We reverse. The deceased was excluded from being eligible for the additional coverage, because he was not…