From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caraballo v. New York Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 5, 1991
170 A.D.2d 190 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Summary

firing shots into a crowded bar constituted depraved indifference murder

Summary of this case from Diaz v. Mantello

Opinion

February 5, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.).


The courts of this State have repeatedly held that an order on an application to review objections raised at an examination before trial is not appealable as of right (Sainz v New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 106 A.D.2d 500). Here, plaintiffs' motion for a further examination before trial was, in effect, an application seeking rulings on an examination before trial.

Were we to consider plaintiffs' contentions, we would find that the ruling challenged by the plaintiffs, denying further discovery, was a proper exercise of the trial court's discretion (Hirschfeld v Hirschfeld, 69 N.Y.2d 842, 844).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Kupferman, Ross and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Caraballo v. New York Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 5, 1991
170 A.D.2d 190 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

firing shots into a crowded bar constituted depraved indifference murder

Summary of this case from Diaz v. Mantello
Case details for

Caraballo v. New York Hospital

Case Details

Full title:JAVIER CARABALLO et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK HOSPITAL et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 5, 1991

Citations

170 A.D.2d 190 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
565 N.Y.S.2d 89

Citing Cases

Tommy Hilfiger U.S.A., Inc. v. Ins. Company

It is long established that rulings directed to an examination before trial, whether made upon motion papers…

Steinberg v. Montefiore Medical Center

While defendants' motion for a further deposition was, in effect, an application to compel the mother to…