From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caputo v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 10, 2019
Case Number 19-12424 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 10, 2019)

Summary

denying IFP application where although plaintiff was unemployed, he had savings of $15,000.00 and was part-owner of a home

Summary of this case from Bush v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Opinion

Case Number 19-12424

12-10-2019

JAMES CAPUTO, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.



Magistrate Judge David R. Grand ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Presently before the Court is the report issued on November 6, 2019 by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that the Court dismiss the complaint without prejudice for failure to prosecute, after the plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis was denied, and the plaintiff failed to pay the required filing fee. Although the magistrate judge's report stated that the parties to this action may object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, no objections have been filed. The parties' failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the report and recommendation (ECF No. 7) is ADOPTED, and the complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

s/David M. Lawson

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge Date: December 10, 2019

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first-class U.S. mail on December 10, 2019.

s/Susan K. Pinkowski

SUSAN K. PINKOWSKI


Summaries of

Caputo v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 10, 2019
Case Number 19-12424 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 10, 2019)

denying IFP application where although plaintiff was unemployed, he had savings of $15,000.00 and was part-owner of a home

Summary of this case from Bush v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
Case details for

Caputo v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES CAPUTO, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 10, 2019

Citations

Case Number 19-12424 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 10, 2019)

Citing Cases

Bush v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Indeed, adequate financial ability has been found, and thus IFP applications denied, where the applicant's…