From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Capes v. Capes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 2, 1916
173 App. Div. 142 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

June 2, 1916.

Robert W. Crawford, for the appellant.

John A. Bolles, for the respondent.


The plaintiff, in support of her motion for alimony and counsel fees, presents nothing from which the court can find sufficient reason to believe that there is a fair probability that on the trial of the issues the charge of adultery against defendant will be sustained. ( Merrell v. Merrell, 168 App. Div. 896.) There is nothing except the allegation in the complaint that defendant did commit the act. It is true that this is alleged as of plaintiff's own knowledge, but, even if she has personal knowledge of the fact, which is improbable, she could not testify to it on the trial. (See Code Civ. Proc. § 831.) If, therefore, she has no other evidence than that which she presents on this motion she must inevitably fail in her action.

The order should be reversed and motion denied, without prejudice to a renewal of the motion upon proper papers.

CLARKE, P.J., DOWLING, SMITH and PAGE, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed and motion denied, without prejudice to renewal of motion upon proper papers.


Summaries of

Capes v. Capes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 2, 1916
173 App. Div. 142 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Capes v. Capes

Case Details

Full title:ANGIA P. CAPES, Respondent, v . WILLIAM P. CAPES, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 2, 1916

Citations

173 App. Div. 142 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
159 N.Y.S. 367

Citing Cases

Burgwinkel v. Burgwinkel

Where the only proof of the adultery charged is that of plaintiff wife, unsupported by competent proof, a…