From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Capers v. Walsh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 5, 2012
CIVIL ACTION No. 12-4780 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 5, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 12-4780

11-05-2012

DONALD CAPERS, Petitioner, v. JEROME WALSH, et al. Respondents.


ORDER

J. CURTIS JOYNER , J.

AND NOW, this 5 day of __, 2012, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED am; ADOPTED;
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED with prejudice;
3. The request for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED;
4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability; and
5. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

______________________

J. CURTIS JOYNER, CHIEF JUDGE


Summaries of

Capers v. Walsh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 5, 2012
CIVIL ACTION No. 12-4780 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Capers v. Walsh

Case Details

Full title:DONALD CAPERS, Petitioner, v. JEROME WALSH, et al. Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 5, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 12-4780 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 5, 2012)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Pa State Attorney Gen.

To the extent Petitioner relies on Martinez v. Ryan, 132 S. Ct. 1309 (2012), to establish equitable tolling,…