From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Capell v. Warden, London Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
May 21, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12cv905 (WOB-MRM) (S.D. Ohio May. 21, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12cv905 (WOB-MRM)

05-21-2014

JAMES ANTONIO CAPELL PETITIONER v. WARDEN, LONDON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION RESPONDENT


JUDGMENT

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 12), and having considered de novo those objections filed thereto by Petitioner (Doc. 15), and the Court having sufficiently considered the matter, and being advised,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the objections be, and they hereby are, overruled; that the Report and Recommendation be, and it hereby is, adopted as the finding of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #2), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 be, and it hereby is, denied with prejudice, and this matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice from the docket of this court. A certificate of appealability shall not issue with respect to any of the claims alleged herein. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), any appeal of this judgment would not be taken in "good faith."

Signed By:

William O. Bertelsman

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Capell v. Warden, London Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
May 21, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12cv905 (WOB-MRM) (S.D. Ohio May. 21, 2014)
Case details for

Capell v. Warden, London Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ANTONIO CAPELL PETITIONER v. WARDEN, LONDON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: May 21, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12cv905 (WOB-MRM) (S.D. Ohio May. 21, 2014)