From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Capak v. Street Execs Mgt.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jun 30, 2021
20 CIVIL 11079 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 30, 2021)

Opinion

20 CIVIL 11079 (RA)

06-30-2021

RICHARD J. CAPAK, Plaintiff, v. STREET EXECS MANAGEMENT, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated June 29, 2021, Defendant's motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's request for oral argument is denied. See Dotson v. Griesa, 398 F.3d 156, 159 (2d Cir. 2005) (“[A] district court acts well within its discretion in deciding dispositive motions on the parties' written submissions without oral argument.”); judgment is entered for Defendant, and this case is closed.


Summaries of

Capak v. Street Execs Mgt.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jun 30, 2021
20 CIVIL 11079 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Capak v. Street Execs Mgt.

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD J. CAPAK, Plaintiff, v. STREET EXECS MANAGEMENT, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jun 30, 2021

Citations

20 CIVIL 11079 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 30, 2021)