Opinion
Case No. 2:15-cv-2407
12-04-2015
CAP CITY DENTAL LAB, LLC Plaintiff, v. RICHARD LADD, et al., Defendant.
Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King ORDER
This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge's November 16, 2015 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 33.) In that filing, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court deny Plaintiff's pending motion to remand this case to state court. (ECF No. 12.)
The R&R advised the parties that, "[i]f any party seeks review by the District Judge of this [R&R], that party may, within fourteen (14) days, file and serve on all parties objections to the [R&R], and the part thereof in question, as well as the basis for objection thereto." (ECF No. 33, at PAGEID # 815.) The R&R specifically advised the parties "that failure to object to the [R&R] will result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the [R&R]." (Id. at PAGEID # 815 (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers, Local 231 etc., 829 F.2d 1370 (6th Cir. 1987); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981)).
The Court has reviewed the R&R. Noting that no objections have been filed, and that the time period for filing objections has expired, the Court hereby ADOPTS AND AFFIRMS the R&R (ECF No. 33) and DENIES Plaintiff's motion to remand this case to state court (ECF No. 12).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Gregory L. Frost
GREGORY L. FROST
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE