Cao v. Taylor

Full title: KHANH CAO, Petitioner, v. DON TAYLOR (Warden), Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jan 14, 2011

CV 02-2076 GAF (CW) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2011)

Opinion

KHANH CAO, Petitioner, v. DON TAYLOR (Warden), Respondent. No. CV 02-2076 GAF (CW) United States District Court, C.D. California. January 14, 2011

         ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          GARY A. FEESS, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court has reviewed the entire record in this action, as well as the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, all objections thereto, and the Supplemental Report and Recommendation. The court has made a de novo determination with respect to those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection has been made.

         IT IS ORDERED: (1) that the Report and Recommendation and Supplemental Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge be accepted; and (2) that judgment be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order and the judgment herein be served on the parties.