From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cantrell v. Hale

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Mar 12, 2012
No. 3:11-1142 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 12, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:11-1142

03-12-2012

RICARDO D. CANTRELL, Plaintiff v. PAMELA HALE, et al. , Defendants


Judge Campbell/Brown

Jury Demand


ORDER

It appears that answers have been filed in this matter. There is a pending motion for default (Docket Entry 20) which is for the Clerk. However, the Magistrate Judge notes that he did give the Defendants until February 29, 2012, to respond and they have done so. Therefore, it appears unlikely that the Clerk will enter a motion for default. A motion for default judgment can only be entertained once an actual default been entered.

This matter has been referred to the undersigned for case management and a report and recommendation on any dispositive matters (Docket Entry 4). This matter is set for a Rule 16 case management conference on March 29, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 783, 801 Broadway, Nashville, Tennessee.

The Defendant is directed to prepare a draft case management schedule and send a copy to the Plaintiff seven days before the hearing. The Plaintiff should bring with him to the case management conference any proposed changes to the order.

It is SO ORDERED.

__________

JOE B. BROWN

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Cantrell v. Hale

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Mar 12, 2012
No. 3:11-1142 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Cantrell v. Hale

Case Details

Full title:RICARDO D. CANTRELL, Plaintiff v. PAMELA HALE, et al. , Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 12, 2012

Citations

No. 3:11-1142 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 12, 2012)