From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cantor v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 9, 1935
155 Misc. 805 (N.Y. App. Term 1935)

Opinion

January 9, 1935.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of New York, Borough of Manhattan, Fifth District.

O'Brien, Boardman, Hewitt, Memhard Early [ Louis C. Haggerty and Peter Keber of counsel], for the appellant.

Alvaro J. Adams, for the respondent.



When plaintiff purchased a season ticket from the defendant the contract between the parties included the provisions of the tariffs filed by the defendant. The defendant was, therefore, justified in forfeiting the season ticket when presented by a stranger.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for the defendant, with costs.

All concur; present, LYDON, HAMMER and FRANKENTHALER, JJ.


Summaries of

Cantor v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 9, 1935
155 Misc. 805 (N.Y. App. Term 1935)
Case details for

Cantor v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.

Case Details

Full title:IRA B. CANTOR, Respondent, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jan 9, 1935

Citations

155 Misc. 805 (N.Y. App. Term 1935)
278 N.Y.S. 448

Citing Cases

Sperry and Hutchinson Co. v. Berkeley

The plaintiff submitted, with its brief, an appendix citing upwards of 50 court decisions, briefly…