From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Canseven v. Just Pups, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Sep 29, 2015
Civ. No. 15-5633 (D.N.J. Sep. 29, 2015)

Opinion

Civ. No. 15-5633

09-29-2015

BERNA CANSEVEN, on behalf of herself and those similarly situated, Plaintiff(s), v. JUST PUPS, LLC and VINCENT LOSACCO, Defendants.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MEMORANDUM ORDER THOMPSON, U.S.D.J.

This action was originally filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey. The parties agree that the basis of federal jurisdiction in this case would be the Class Action Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2) ("CAFA"). CAFA states that a district court should deny jurisdiction where "two-thirds or more of the members of all proposed plaintiff classes in the aggregate, and the primary defendants, are citizens of the State in which the action was originally filed." 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(4)(B).

It is undisputed that defendants Just Pups, LLC and Vincent Losacco are citizens of New Jersey. On September 25, 2015, the parties stipulated that more than two-thirds of the putative plaintiff class is made up of New Jersey citizens. This Court therefore lacks subject matter jurisdiction under CAFA, and must remand the case to state court. 28 U.S.C. § 1447.

For these reasons, IT IS, on this 29th day of September, 2015,

ORDERED that this case is REMANDED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and

IT IS ORDERED that the case is closed.

/s/ Anne E . Thompson

ANNE E. THOMPSON, U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

Canseven v. Just Pups, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Sep 29, 2015
Civ. No. 15-5633 (D.N.J. Sep. 29, 2015)
Case details for

Canseven v. Just Pups, LLC

Case Details

Full title:BERNA CANSEVEN, on behalf of herself and those similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Sep 29, 2015

Citations

Civ. No. 15-5633 (D.N.J. Sep. 29, 2015)