From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cannon v. Humana Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE
Dec 10, 2012
No. 3:12-0949 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 10, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:12-0949

12-10-2012

PATSY T. CANNON, Plaintiff, v. HUMANA INSURANCE COMPANY A/K/A AND D/B/A HUMANA HEALTH PLAN INC. Defendant.

Hans P. Schmidt (BPR # 028108) Counsel for Defendant Van French (BPR #6922) Counsel for Plaintiff


Judge Sharp

Magistrate Judge Griffin


AGREED ORDER OF SUBSTITUTION

Plaintiff Patsy T. Canon ("Plaintiff" or "Canon") and Defendant Humana Insurance Company ("Humana") hereby agree that the proper defendant in this case is Humana Insurance Company. Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to terminate Humana Insurance Company a/k/a and d/b/a Humana Health Plan, Inc. as the defendant in this case and to substitute therefor Humana Insurance Company.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

JULIET GRIFFIN

United States Magistrate Judge

APPROVED FOR ENTRY:

______________________
Hans P. Schmidt (BPR # 028108)
Counsel for Defendant
______________________
Van French (BPR #6922)
Counsel for Plaintiff


Summaries of

Cannon v. Humana Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE
Dec 10, 2012
No. 3:12-0949 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Cannon v. Humana Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:PATSY T. CANNON, Plaintiff, v. HUMANA INSURANCE COMPANY A/K/A AND D/B/A…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE

Date published: Dec 10, 2012

Citations

No. 3:12-0949 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 10, 2012)