Opinion
Case Number: 1:08cv612.
March 30, 2010
ORDER
This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Hogan. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on March 4, 2010 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 20). Subsequently, the petitioner filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 22).
The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED with prejudice.
A certificate of appealability will not issue with respect to the claims alleged in the petition because petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right based on the claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed.R.App.P. 22(b).
The Court will certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of any Order adopting the Report and Recommendation will not be taken in "good faith" and, therefore, DENIES petitioner leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis upon a showing of financial necessity. See Fed.R.App.P. 24(a); Kincade v. Sparkman, 117 F.3d 949, 952 (6th Cir. 1997).
IT IS SO ORDERED.