From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cannedy v. Adams

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Nov 2, 2009
ED CV 08-1230-CJC(E) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2009)

Opinion


EARL EUGENE CANNEDY, JR., Petitioner, v. DARREL ADAMS, Warden, Respondent. No. ED CV 08-1230-CJC(E) United States District Court, C.D. California. November 2, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Court approves and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered requiring that Respondent discharge Petitioner from all adverse consequences of his conviction in Riverside County Superior Court case number INF 046350, unless Petitioner is brought to retrial within ninety (90) days of the date the Judgment becomes final, plus any additional delay authorized under State law.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein by United States mail on Petitioner, counsel for Petitioner, and counsel for Respondent.

         LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Cannedy v. Adams

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Nov 2, 2009
ED CV 08-1230-CJC(E) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2009)
Case details for

Cannedy v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:EARL EUGENE CANNEDY, JR., Petitioner, v. DARREL ADAMS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Nov 2, 2009

Citations

ED CV 08-1230-CJC(E) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2009)